US-EU tariff agreement marks a significant victory for Trump, yet Brussels has not emerged without advantages.
After weeks of intense negotiations between top trade officials, the European Union and the United States have finally reached a framework deal, just in time for America's upcoming tariff discussions with China.
![]() |
Courtesy : Getty Images |
It took an in-person meeting between leaders from Washington and Brussels to finalize this agreement, highlighting the importance of direct dialogue in such complex negotiations. This approach is reminiscent of other deals brokered by President Donald Trump, where his personal engagement has often made a difference even when the situation seemed dire. This deal is significant for both sides, as countless businesses and jobs rely on what the EU refers to as "the world's largest bilateral trade and investment relationship." The Trump administration is viewing this as a major victory, and indeed, it has its merits. However, it also presents a balanced situation for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
"The entire European press is singing the president's praises right now, amazed at the deal he negotiated on behalf of Americans," Vice President JD Vance commented on social media platform X. He added, "Tomorrow, the American media will undoubtedly run headlines like 'Donald Trump Only Got 99.9 Percent of What He Asked For.'" The EU has managed to negotiate a 15% tariff from the US, which is an improvement over the previously threatened 30%. However, this still represents a significant reduction from the lighter tariffs in place before Trump's so-called Liberation Day in April and is also higher than the UK's current 10% rate.
Fortunately, Brussels can highlight that this lower tariff is applicable to many key European exports. For instance, EU automakers will now deal with a 15% import tax, a relief compared to the earlier 25% global tariff introduced in April. In exchange, Trump noted that the EU has agreed to open its markets to American exports at no tariff at all. However, it's worth mentioning that EU steel and aluminum will continue facing steep tariffs of 50% when exported to the US. For Trump, still buoyed by the recent tariffs agreement with Japan, this announcement represents another significant win. The EU deal is expected to generate approximately $90 billion (£67 billion) in tariff revenue for the US government, based on last year's trade data.
As part of this arrangement, the EU is slated to purchase US energy products and arms worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Trump has claimed that the EU's investment in the US will increase by $600 billion, including acquisitions of American military equipment, while also allocating $750 billion for energy. This deal is being promoted as a pivotal moment in the relationship between Washington and Brussels. Reaching this point hasn't been straightforward. Both parties were firm in their positions, but neither was willing to let negotiations extend beyond the 1 August deadline.
In recent weeks, the bloc has been working hard to establish itself as a strong negotiator, preparing retaliatory tariffs and emphasizing that they might be implemented if necessary. For years, the American president has criticized what he sees as unfair trade practices from Europe. A significant factor in this is the trade deficit. Last year, the US imported $236 billion more in goods from the EU than it exported to the region. Trump tends to simplify this issue, arguing that it's American wealth leaving the country unnecessarily. However, the truth is that international trade is much more nuanced. Another point of contention has been the EU's stringent regulations on a wide range of products—from cars to poultry—which make it more difficult for American companies to enter the EU market compared to the reverse challenge. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has recognized the importance of addressing the deficit.
When announcing the agreement, she stated, "We need to rebalance it. We maintain an excellent trade relationship." She noted the significant volume of trade between them and expressed the intention to make it more sustainable. As the talks began, the EU faced considerable challenges in its bargaining position. The prospect of a trade war with the world’s largest economy could not have come at a worse time, especially given Europe’s sluggish economic growth. Just last week, the European Central Bank cautioned that "the environment remains exceptionally uncertain, particularly due to trade disputes." This agreement helps ease some of that uncertainty. Furthermore, Europe relies heavily on the US for its security. In the minds of those on the Brussels negotiating team, there were likely concerns about potential actions from Trump, such as halting arms supplies to Ukraine, withdrawing the American military from the region, or even jeopardizing NATO commitments.
No comments: